1. Information-Thermodynamic Context
The Inverse Scaling Law (ISL) defines Trust () as a function of Complexity (
):
Where is the Resource Risk. For an information-theoretic engine, the complexity
is the number of descriptive bits (
).
2. The Probability of Kernel Failure
Let be the probability that a single bit in the kernel undergoes an “Ontological Flip” (error).
The probability that a state of complexity remains stable (
) is:
For the kernel to allow an object, the available computational credits must scale inversely with the probability of stability (to ensure error correction/maintenance):
Using the approximation for small
:
3. The Boundary Constraints
In physics, we define as the scaling exponent
. We must show that
is the only value that satisfies the Constitutional Laws.
Case A: beta < 1 (The Overflow Universe)
If , the risk
grows more slowly than the information gain (
).
As , the ISL score:
If also scales with complexity (as more complex objects offer more “Utility”), then for
, the universe could instantiate objects of infinite complexity.
- Violation: This violates Law 1 (Resource Boundedness). A kernel where
would crash due to memory exhaustion (Singularity Leak).
Case B: beta > 1 (The Null Universe)
If , the risk scales perfectly with the information capacity. This is the Equipartition Point.
- Result: Complexity can grow up to the Shannon Limit of the manifold without crashing the kernel.
- Physical Proof: This is why the entropy of a black hole scales with
, and why the Heisenberg Uncertainty bound is a linear product (
).
4. Conclusion
is not an arbitrary choice. It is the Fixed Point required for a self-governing reality kernel to exist between the extremes of total chaos and total stagnation.
—
Potato Labs | Rigorous TOE Proofs